diff options
| author | Tianren Dong <tianrendong.dtr@gmail.com> | 2026-05-31 14:19:04 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tianren Dong <tianrendong.dtr@gmail.com> | 2026-05-31 14:19:04 -0400 |
| commit | d21ebf7b96c90943ab48ffcd6d5b02c6f7438c04 (patch) | |
| tree | 00a005deb29fd4071c0d67be8e533bab5972d850 /docs/COMPARISON.md | |
| parent | 0fc5b8950601a36dfffdc8f7163bb12fb94f353e (diff) | |
0.15.29: CSP bypass via CDP Runtime.evaluate for evaluate/snapshot/waitFor/initScript
- evaluateInTab/executeInTab now run through CDP Runtime.evaluate instead of
new Function() in MAIN world, so chrome_evaluate/chrome_snapshot work on pages
that block unsafe-eval (github.com, many bank/SaaS apps). Preserves value
markers (undefined/function/symbol/bigint/Error), DOMRect expansion, and the
expression/statement fallback; keeps {ok,value} error envelope.
- page.waitFor polls via service-worker-side CDP evaluation.
- chrome_navigate initScript uses Page.addScriptToEvaluateOnNewDocument.
- Add npm test (test-suite/unit/csp-eval.test.mjs) and in-browser regression
challenge 42 strict-csp-evaluate; update challenge 39 notes + docs/primer.
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/COMPARISON.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/COMPARISON.md | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/docs/COMPARISON.md b/docs/COMPARISON.md index 3f8db12..16cd81a 100644 --- a/docs/COMPARISON.md +++ b/docs/COMPARISON.md @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ If your threat model excludes extensions with broad permissions, neither approac ## Public benchmarks worth knowing (for axis 2 / axis 3 comparison) -Pi-chrome itself ships a benchmark suite ([`../test-suite/`](../test-suite)) of **41 primitive challenges** plus **4 hermetic BrowserGym-style long-horizon tasks** covering trusted input, pointer humanization, keyboard fidelity, drag/drop, Shadow DOM, iframes, file uploads, strict-CSP screenshot fallback, dynamic waits, tab lifecycle, network observability, fingerprint leaks, and agent-safety honeypots. Scoring tracks expected outcomes per challenge instead of raw PASS count, with `core`, `conditional`, and `quality` gate buckets. That's **driver-level** grading. +Pi-chrome itself ships a benchmark suite ([`../test-suite/`](../test-suite)) of **42 primitive challenges** plus **4 hermetic BrowserGym-style long-horizon tasks** covering trusted input, pointer humanization, keyboard fidelity, drag/drop, Shadow DOM, iframes, file uploads, strict-CSP screenshot fallback and CDP eval/snapshot bypass, dynamic waits, tab lifecycle, network observability, fingerprint leaks, and agent-safety honeypots. Scoring tracks expected outcomes per challenge instead of raw PASS count, with `core`, `conditional`, and `quality` gate buckets. That's **driver-level** grading. For **agent-level** comparison (axis 2), the public benchmarks worth citing: |
