aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mcp/package-lock.json
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2026-10-15mcp: pi-chrome-mcp joins the fork as sz-chrome-remote-extension, loading the ↵Igor Soarez
fork's own extension
2026-09-25ship the pi side we actually run, not a different arrangementIgor Soarez
The README told pi users to install pi-chrome directly and run /chrome authorize every session. That is not how this is used: pi reaches the same MCP server through pi-mcp-adapter, with pi's own pi-chrome switched off, which is why nobody types /chrome authorize. pi/browser-gate.ts is that setup's missing piece, generalised from the one in use: it answers pi-mcp-adapter's approval broker for one server, asking once per session instead of once per call (the adapter's own grant only covers identical arguments, so for a browser it asks nearly every time). /browser authorize, /browser revoke, and PI_BROWSER_AUTHORIZE for headless runs. approveTools stays on in mcp.json as the backstop if the gate does not load. The README now leads with that: install the adapter, register the server in mcp.json, copy the gate. Installing pi-chrome in pi is kept as the alternative, with what it costs - two definitions of the browser, /chrome authorize per session, and the trap of loading the extension twice. Tested on an isolated pi config against a stand-in browser: with PI_BROWSER_AUTHORIZE the call reaches the browser, without it the gate denies it.