diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/2026-08-04-ai-answers.md | 235 |
1 files changed, 235 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/2026-08-04-ai-answers.md b/docs/2026-08-04-ai-answers.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..29b5a6b --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/2026-08-04-ai-answers.md @@ -0,0 +1,235 @@ +# AI answers on the SERP — findings, 2026-08-04 + +Status: **investigated, not implemented, not decided.** Nothing in `src/` has +changed. This is the field notes for whoever picks it up. + +The question was whether the AI answer block that Google, Bing and Brave now put +above their results ("AI Overview", the Bing generative answer, Brave's AI +summary) is worth pulling into `castle_cdp_search`'s output alongside the ranked +results. It is not obviously worth it — the cost is real and is set out below — +so the decision was deferred rather than taken. + +Everything here was read off the live SERPs in castle's Chrome on 2026-08-04, in +the signed-in `~/.chrome-cdp-profile`, `hl=en`. Same rule as `engines.ts`: what +is written down is what was observed. Where something was *not* verified it says +so. + +## What is there, per engine + +| Engine | Block | Container observed | Sources exposed | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| Google | "AI Overview" | `#m-x-content` | yes, with titles | +| Bing | generative answer | `li.b_ans.b_top.b_qnacdxcont` → `.gs_caphead_main` | yes, cards in `.gs_cit` | +| Brave | AI summary | `#chatllm-main-answer-content` | no | +| DuckDuckGo | none | — | — | + +DuckDuckGo is a genuine "none", not an unfinished check: the engine points at the +no-JS `html.duckduckgo.com` endpoint, which cannot render one. There is no +`.zci`/zero-click block on it either — that was checked directly. + +### Google + +The overview lives **outside `#search` and `#rso`**, above them. That was +verified (`rso.contains(node) === false`), and it means the current extractor +neither sees it nor is disturbed by it — no existing behaviour is at risk here. + +Structure of `#m-x-content`, on a query that had one: + +``` +#m-x-content + [jsname=txosbe] "AI Overview" ← the header + [jsname=HKDuG] the answer body ← also contains the citations + … answer prose + [role=dialog] "6 sites" + cards + "Show all" +``` + +Hooks, ranked by how much they can be trusted: + +- `#m-x-content` — an id, present on both loads. The most durable thing found. + **But see the trap below: the id alone is not sufficient.** +- `[role=heading]` with the exact text `AI Overview`, and + `[aria-label="Show more AI Overview"]` on the collapse control. Semantic, and + the natural anchor if the id ever moves. +- `[role=dialog]` around the citation carousel (`data-type=hovc`). +- Class names — **useless**, as everywhere else on Google. The answer body was + `.LT6XE` on one load and `.jloFI GkDqAd rJweXb` on the next, same query, + minutes apart. This is the same churn `engines.ts` already warns about. + +**Citations are the good part.** Anchors inside `#m-x-content` carry the source +title in `aria-label`, suffixed `". Opens in a new tab."`: + +``` +aria-label="Open source agentic startup LangChain hits $1.25B valuation | TechCrunch. Opens in a new tab." +href="https://techcrunch.com/2025/10/21/open-source-agentic-startup-langchain-hits-1-25b-valuation/" +``` + +Their `innerText` is empty — the visible label is an icon — so `aria-label` is +the only way to get a title. Links out directly, no redirector, so the existing +`unwrap: "none"` holds. Google's own hosts appear among them (a privacy-policy +link) and are already excluded by `selfHostPattern`. + +Two traps: + +1. **`#m-x-content` exists before the overview does, holding something else.** + Polling a fresh load at 250ms intervals caught it at 1502ms containing 28,864 + characters — approximately the whole SERP — and at 1752ms containing 142, then + growing to its real 903. So the id is reused by, or briefly wraps, a larger + shell. An extractor that reads it on sight will occasionally return the entire + page as the "AI answer". **Require the text to begin with `AI Overview`, or + anchor on the heading and climb, before trusting the node.** +2. **"Show more" is not hiding any of the answer.** Clicking it took the text + from 1124 to 1262 characters, and the 138 added were the disclaimer footer + ("Double-check important information… AI responses may include mistakes"). + The answer body is complete in the DOM while still visually truncated. So + there is no need to click anything — which is good, because clicking in a + browser a human is using is exactly what this package avoids. + +To render usefully, the extractor has to drop the `AI Overview` header line, the +`[role=dialog]` citation carousel, the "Show all" / "Dismiss" / "Learn how" +buttons and the disclaimer. Cleanest approach found: `cloneNode(true)`, remove +those by selector on the clone, take `innerText`. The page itself is never +mutated, which matters on a shared browser. + +### Bing + +``` +li.b_ans.b_top.b_qnacdxcont + .gs_caphead_main the answer prose ← clean, nothing else in it + .gs_cit_cont + .gs_cit source card: name, title, snippet + .gs_cit … + .cit_exp_cont "View all" +``` + +The `gs_` prefix ("generative search") is descriptive rather than hashed, and +`.gs_caphead_main` held the answer and *only* the answer — no header, no cards, +no disclaimer. The nicest of the three to extract. + +`li.b_ans` on its own is **not** a safe selector: "People also ask" is also a +`li.b_ans`. The discriminator is `b_qnacdxcont` on the `li`, or the presence of +`.gs_caphead_main` inside it. + +Citation anchors go through Bing's `/ck/a?…&u=a1…` redirector, so the existing +`unwrap: "bing"` already handles them — no new unwrapping needed. + +No URL change is needed: the answer appears on the plain +`bing.com/search?q=…` the engine already builds. + +### Brave + +`#chatllm-main-answer-content` contained the answer and nothing else — no +header, no disclaimer (that sits outside it, in `cite.chatllm-disclaimer`), no +citations. The wrapper is `#llm-snippet`, a `.snippet.standalone` sitting first +in `#results`. + +Worth noting: `engines.ts` already restricts Brave's results to +`.snippet[data-type="web"]` specifically to exclude this block. That filter +stays correct — the AI answer would be read separately, not as a result. + +No sources are exposed. The only anchors inside are `search.brave.com/ask?…` +follow-up prompts ("Elaborate", "Who are LangChain's main competitors?"), which +`selfHostPattern` already discards. There is a "+4 More" control that may reveal +sources; **not investigated** — it would need a click, and clicking was avoided. + +No URL change needed. + +## The two reasons this is not free + +### 1. Google's AI Overview requires giving up `udm=14` + +`udm` is Google's undocumented vertical selector — the parameter its own tab +strip writes. `udm=2` is Images, `udm=7` Videos, `udm=12` News, `udm=28` +Shopping, and `udm=14` is the "Web" tab added in May 2024: plain ranked links, +no AI Overview, no knowledge panel, no carousels. `engines.ts` sets it as +Google's default precisely for that cleanliness. + +So "no AI Overview" is not incidental to `udm=14`, it is part of what the Web tab +*is*. Every page where `#m-x-content` was found was a no-`udm` classic SERP. +Enabling overviews on Google means dropping `udm`. + +That is less alarming than it sounds: the engine **already** drops `udm` for any +time-limited search, because `udm=14` plus a date filter renders an empty page +(README, trap 2). Heading-mode extraction is therefore already exercised against +the classic layout. The cost is that the classic layout puts back all the +furniture — knowledge panels, "People also ask", carousels — that the extractor +then has to keep ignoring. + +### 2. They stream in after the results are ready, and are often absent + +Measured from navigation start, polling at 250ms via an `initScript`: + +| Engine | results parseable | AI answer appears | AI answer settles | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| Google | ~500ms | ~1500ms | ~2300ms | +| Brave | ~290ms | ~1260ms | **still growing at 5000ms** | +| Bing | ~520ms | — (absent on that query) | — | + +`search.ts` reads results and returns as soon as anything parses, retrying at +most twice at 700ms (`EXTRACT_RETRIES`, `EXTRACT_RETRY_DELAY_MS`) and breaking +the moment `results.length > 0`. In other words it returns roughly 2s before +Google's overview lands and 5s+ before Brave's finishes. **Capturing an AI answer +means deliberately waiting past the point where the useful part of the job is +already done.** + +And the wait is frequently wasted, because the blocks are query-dependent: + +- `how does postgres MVCC vacuum work` → **no** Google AI Overview at all, still + absent after 15s, in a foreground tab. (Checked in a foreground tab + specifically to rule out background-tab throttling as the cause — an earlier + `window.open` probe was discarded for that reason.) +- `who founded anthropic and when` → **no** Bing generative answer after 13.5s; + Bing served an ordinary big-Wikipedia card instead. +- `LangChain valuation Series C funding 2026` → all three produced one. + +There is no cheap way to know in advance which case you are in, so a fixed wait +pays the full cost on every query that was never going to have an answer. + +## The decision that was not taken + +Three shapes were on the table: + +1. **Opt-in `aiAnswer` parameter (the one that was going to be recommended).** + Default off: today's latency and today's `udm=14` layout, byte-identical + behaviour. When true: Google drops `udm`, and the probe polls until the text + stops growing or a budget (~6s) expires. Costs nothing unless asked for, and + the model can ask for it when the query is a question rather than a lookup. + Downside: another parameter on a tool that already has four, and the model has + to decide when to set it. +2. **Always on.** Simplest surface, no new parameter. Every search pays ~2s + (Google) to ~5s (Brave), much of it waiting for answers that never arrive, + against a 20s whole-call deadline (`SEARCH_TIMEOUT_MS`) that also has to cover + connect and navigate. +3. **Opportunistic, never wait.** Include an AI answer only if it is already + rendered when results are read. Zero added latency, but Google would + essentially never contribute one (`udm=14` stays), and Brave would usually be + caught mid-sentence — see the growth curve above. Risks putting a truncated, + confident-sounding half-answer in front of the model, which is worse than + putting none there. + +Unresolved either way: whether an AI answer belongs in the model's context at +all. It is a summary generated by another model from pages the agent could read +itself, it carries no provenance beyond its citations, and `promptGuidelines` +currently tells the model in plain terms not to treat a snippet as the page. +An AI answer invites exactly that confusion at greater length. If it goes in, it +should be labelled unmistakably as the engine's generated text — engine name +included, e.g. "Google AI Overview" — and never merged into the numbered results. + +## If you implement it + +- `ExtractionConfig` in `src/engines.ts` is the right place for the per-engine + selectors; it is already plain JSON crossing into the page. +- `PageProbe` in `src/extract.ts` gains an optional field; `SearchResult` should + **not** — an AI answer is not a hit and must not be numbered among them. +- The settle-poll belongs in the page script, not in round trips from + `search.ts`. One `Runtime.evaluate` that polls locally until the text stops + growing is one round trip; polling from the host is one per sample. +- `formatResults` in `src/format.ts` puts it above the numbered list. Mind the + budget note at the top of that file — an overview plus citations is another + 1-2KB on top of the 15KB worst case. +- Tests: `test/search-url.test.ts` is where a "Google drops `udm` when an AI + answer is wanted" assertion goes, next to the existing parameter-trap tests. + The extraction itself cannot be tested without a browser; the existing suite + does not try, and this should not either. +- Re-verify every selector before trusting it. Google's classes churned between + two loads minutes apart during this very investigation, and these blocks are + changing faster than the rest of the SERP. |