<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>pi-castle-cdp-search.git/docs/2026-08-04-ai-answers.md, branch master</title>
<subtitle>Search castle's Chrome tabs and history over CDP</subtitle>
<id>https://git.soarez.net/sz/pi-castle-cdp-search.git/atom/docs/2026-08-04-ai-answers.md?h=master</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.soarez.net/sz/pi-castle-cdp-search.git/atom/docs/2026-08-04-ai-answers.md?h=master'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.soarez.net/sz/pi-castle-cdp-search.git/'/>
<updated>2026-08-04T14:08:47Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>Write up what AI answer blocks would cost before building one</title>
<updated>2026-08-04T14:08:47Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Igor Soarez</name>
<email>igor@soarez.org</email>
</author>
<published>2026-08-04T14:08:47Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.soarez.net/sz/pi-castle-cdp-search.git/commit/?id=4ad98a78bebf787bde419ab245f970a4885b1b15'/>
<id>urn:sha1:4ad98a78bebf787bde419ab245f970a4885b1b15</id>
<content type='text'>
Google, Bing and Brave all put a generated answer above their results now,
and none of it is being read. Investigated against castle's Chrome; nothing
in src/ changed, because the cost turned out to be worth deciding on rather
than absorbing.

Two things make it expensive. Google's AI Overview exists only on the
classic layout — udm=14 is the "Web" tab, and having no overview is part of
what that tab is — so enabling it means giving back the clean page the
extractor was built around. And all three stream in after the results are
already parseable: Google settles ~2.3s in, Brave was still growing at 5s,
against an extractor that returns at ~0.5s. The wait is often wasted, since
the blocks are query-dependent — no Google overview for "how does postgres
MVCC vacuum work" after 15s, no Bing answer for "who founded anthropic".

Selectors, the traps behind them (#m-x-content briefly holds ~29k
characters of unrelated page; Google's "Show more" hides only the
disclaimer), the measured timings, three possible designs and their
tradeoffs are all in the doc, so this does not have to be re-measured if
the answer turns out to be yes.
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
